Author

admin

Browsing

Wednesday saw oil prices dip, as markets analysed the results of US-China trade discussions, which still await President Donald Trump’s review. 

Market pressures included weak oil demand from China coupled with increased output from OPEC+.

Despite recent strength, and what could be viewed as a potential breakout, oil has yet to push out of a trading range which has been building over the last two months,” said David Morrison, senior market analyst at Trade Nation. 

Prices appear to be pausing as they await a fresh catalyst. 

This seems likely to come from supply commentary, or trade developments, particularly any news from US-China trade talks. 

At the time of writing, the price of West Texas Intermediate crude oil on the New York Mercantile Exchange was at $65.07 a barrel, largely unchanged from the previous close. Brent crude oil on the Intercontinental Exchange was also flat at $66.89 a barrel. 

Both benchmarks had fallen earlier in the session on Wednesday. 

Experts believe that oil prices have experienced brief periods of bullishness, but those have not materialised into substantial rallies.

From a bullish standpoint, the daily moving average divergence convergence appears generally constructive. It has returned to and continues to rise above the neutral level. 

“But crude has been in this situation many times over the past year or so. And rally attempts have tended to be snuffed out relatively quickly,” Morrison said. 

Source: FXempire

Trade negotiations

Following intense two-day London talks, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick reported Tuesday that American and Chinese officials have established a framework aimed at restoring their trade agreement and addressing China’s export limitations on rare earth minerals and magnets.

Trump will be briefed on the outcome before approving it, Lutnick added.

Meanwhile, a federal appeals court handed Trump a victory Tuesday, deciding his “Liberation Day” tariffs could remain in place for now. 

This reverses a prior decision by the US Court of International Trade, which had deemed the tariffs’ enactment illegal and blocked their implementation last month.

The oil market remains cautious amid the increasingly complex trade narratives of the Trump administration. 

Supply

Simultaneously, regarding supply, OPEC+ intends to raise oil output by 411,000 barrels daily in July, continuing their fourth consecutive month of easing production cuts. 

Some experts, however, question if regional demand will be sufficient to absorb this additional supply.

The summer driving season in the US is likely to generate some demand for fuel in the world’s biggest consumer of crude oil. 

However, experts remain skeptical about whether global oil demand could meet OPEC’s supply increases. 

Eight countries from the OPEC+ group, including Saudi Arabia and Russia have been raising output of oil by 411,000 barrels a day each month since May. 

EIA predicts fall in US production

According to the latest Short-Term Energy Outlook, published late on Tuesday, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) has adjusted its 2026 projections for US crude oil production downward. 

The EIA now forecasts a 50,000 barrel per day year-on-year decrease in 2026, bringing output to 13.37 million barrels per day. 

Notably, this projected decline would mark the first annual drop in US production since 2021, when production was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

For 2025, annual output growth is projected to remain constant at 210,000 barrels per day year-over-year.

“The decline isn’t too surprising, given the recent slowdown in drilling activity,” Warren Patterson, head of commodities strategy at ING Group, said. 

A 33-rig decline over the past six weeks has pushed the US oil rig count to 442, marking its lowest point since October 2021, amid the current period of low prices.

ING’s Patterson added:

Given our view that oil prices will be lower towards the end of this year, there’s scope for further downward revisions in US crude oil output estimates for next year.

Uncertainties in refined product market

Amid rising uncertainty in the refined products market, the European Commission, led by President Ursula von der Leyen, has proposed an import ban on goods derived from Russian crude oil.

The European Union has prohibited imports of Russian crude oil and refined products.

However, refined products derived from Russian crude are still entering the bloc through third-party countries.

“This would mostly put refined product imports from India and Turkey at risk,” Patterson said. 

India and Turkiye are significant importers of Russian crude oil, collectively receiving 1.77 million barrels per day in the first quarter of 2025, as per LSEG data. 

Concurrently, India and Turkiye are also exporters of refined petroleum products to the European Union, which imported over 350,000 barrels daily from these two nations. 

Patterson added:

Such a move would lead to yet another shift in refined product trade flows. But the Commission implementing such a ban would be difficult, given that refiners blend different types of crude oil.

The post Crude oil awaits fresh catalyst to rise further: can recent strength hold? appeared first on Invezz

India’s Maruti Suzuki, facing rare earth shortages, has significantly reduced its initial electric vehicle e-Vitara production goals by two-thirds, as revealed in a document, highlighting ongoing supply chain disruptions within the automotive sector due to China’s export restrictions, Reuters reported.

Reuters has reviewed a company document indicating that India’s leading car manufacturer, despite initially stating on Monday that the ongoing supply chain issues had not affected them, has adjusted its production targets for the e-Vitara. 

The revised plan outlines the production of approximately 8,200 e-Vitaras from April to September, down from the initial target of 26,500 units.

Shortages in the rare earth materials crucial for magnets and various high-tech components were cited as the reason behind the constraints on supply.

The document still stated that Maruti intends to achieve its annual EV production goal of 67,000 units for the fiscal year ending March 2026 by increasing output in the months ahead.

China’s dominance

China’s imposition of restrictions on the export of specific rare earth minerals has sent shockwaves through the international automotive manufacturing sector, triggering widespread alarm among major players. 

These companies have publicly expressed grave concerns about the potential for severe disruptions to their intricate and globally interconnected supply chains. 

While some firms based in the United States, across various nations in Europe, and within Japan have reported a gradual easing of supply pressures, attributed to their successful acquisition of necessary export licenses directly from Beijing authorities, India remains conspicuously in a state of limbo. 

Indian industries are still awaiting the critical regulatory approvals from China, leading to escalating anxieties about the imminent threat of potential production halts and significant economic setbacks. 

This geopolitical tension has underscored the vulnerability of global industries to trade disputes and resource control, further emphasising the strategic importance of diversifying supply chains and developing alternative sources for essential materials. 

The situation also highlights the complex interplay between international trade policies, national interests, and industrial stability in the modern world economy.

Maruti’s e-Vitara

The e-Vitara, unveiled with significant anticipation at India’s car show this January, is vital for Maruti Suzuki’s electric vehicle strategy in the nation. 

This launch represents Maruti’s debut in a market segment the Indian government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, aims to expand to 30% of all car sales by 2030, a substantial increase from the approximately 2.5% recorded last year.

A production delay for Maruti Suzuki’s electric SUV, the e-Vitara, has surfaced due to a rare earths supply issue.

This could negatively affect Suzuki Motor, as India is its primary revenue market and a key electric vehicle manufacturing center. 

Most of the India-made e-Vitaras are intended for export to Europe and Japan by mid-2025.

Despite these concerns, Maruti stated that the rare earths problem would not significantly delay the e-Vitara’s launch. 

Chair RC Bhargava had also noted that production is currently unaffected. Neither Maruti nor Suzuki responded to requests for further comments.

Following the announcement, Maruti’s stock price on the Indian stock exchange experienced a decline, dropping as much as 1.4% to reach its lowest point of the day.

The company has not yet commenced bookings for the e-Vitara.

Some analysts have expressed concern that Maruti’s EV launch is delayed in the world’s third-largest car market, where Tesla is also anticipated to start sales this year.

The post Supply chain issues force India’s Maruti to revise EV production targets appeared first on Invezz

European stock markets showed a mixed and generally flat performance in early trading on Wednesday, as investors weighed positive developments in US-China trade negotiations against some underwhelming corporate earnings and awaited key economic data.

While a tentative trade agreement offered a degree of optimism, individual market movements were nuanced.

About 30 minutes into Wednesday’s trading session, the pan-European Stoxx 600 index was seen trading flat, indicating no cohesive directional momentum among individual sectors.

Looking at the major national stock exchanges, France’s CAC 40 emerged as an early front-runner, posting a gain of around 0.3%.

London’s FTSE 100 was last seen trading 0.1% higher, while Germany’s DAX index showed little change from its previous close.

US-China trade talks: a framework for agreement

A significant driver for global market sentiment was the news emerging from high-level trade talks between the United States and China in London.

After a second day of discussions, representatives from both nations announced they had reached an agreement on a framework to ease trade tensions, with the deal now awaiting approval from the leaders of the two countries.

“We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents,” US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters.

A critical component of this latest agreement involves Chinese restrictions on rare-earth exports to the US Lutnick stated that this is a “fundamental part” of the deal and that the US expects the issue “will be resolved in this framework implementation.”

He further indicated that US restrictions on sales of advanced technology to China, imposed in recent weeks, would likely be rolled back as Beijing approves rare-earth exports.

Global markets had a mixed initial reaction to this tentative consensus. Asia-Pacific markets climbed overnight on the apparent breakthrough.

However, US stock futures inched lower, with investors also looking ahead to US May inflation data, which could influence future Federal Reserve policy.

Corporate spotlight: Inditex sales miss

On the corporate front, Zara owner Inditex reported weaker-than-expected quarterly sales on Wednesday.

The Spanish retail giant also flagged a slower start to the summer season compared to last year, citing broader economic uncertainty.

Inditex posted revenues of 8.27 billion euros ($9.44 billion) for its fiscal first quarter (February 1 to April 30), slightly below the 8.39 billion euros forecast by LSEG analysts.

Net income for the quarter came in at 1.3 billion euros, just shy of the 1.32 billion euros analysts had estimated.

In other notable news, tech billionaire Elon Musk stated on Wednesday that he regretted some of the social media posts he made last week during an explosive and highly public dispute with his formerly close ally, US President Donald Trump.

This admission follows a period of escalating tension between the two prominent figures.

The post Europe markets open: Stoxx 600 steady as US-China agree on trade plan; Inditex Q1 sales weaker appeared first on Invezz

Expect the House of Representatives to make ‘technical corrections’ to President Donald Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ Wednesday.

But if you blink, you might miss it.

Senate Republicans are now in the middle of the ‘Byrd Bath’ with Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough. This is a process, named after late Senate Majority Leader Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., to exclude provisions from budget reconciliation packages that don’t comport with special Senate budget rules. 

The Senate must use this special process to avoid a filibuster.

Some items in the House bill don’t fit into the bill under those special budget rules. So, they are tossing them out. But the House must essentially alter the bill and send it back to the Senate.

The House will embed those changes into a ‘rule’ Wednesday to tee up the spending cancellations bill to trim money for USAID and public broadcasting for debate and a vote on Friday.

So, the ‘altered’ bill, with the technical corrections, goes back to the Senate.

‘I think it’s going to be nothing that was unexpected. I don’t think it’s going to be a problem,’ House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said.

‘I’m trying to defend my product that was sent over there. As you all know, it took a long time to get that balance.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Several Democratic senators, including one who remains the preacher at Martin Luther King Jr.’s church, joined several clergy members for a vigil in opposition to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act on the Capitol steps Tuesday.

‘Clergy and leaders in robes, collars and religious vestments will offer prayers, sing songs, read scripture and testify to the Gospel, providing a moral reckoning at this critical moment in history,’ read an advisory announcing the vigil obtained by Fox News Digital.

Rev. Jim Wallis, who advised the Obama administration on faith and neighborhood partnerships, told the crowd they ‘come today in spiritual procession – singing, reading Scripture and coming for a vigil on the Senate steps.’

‘Some say that we should keep faith out of politics – we’re saying while the Bible doesn’t give us detailed legislation, it tells us who to care for,’ Wallis went on. ‘We don’t want to let Jesus Christ be left outside the Senate chamber for this vote.’

Wallis called Republicans’ budget a ‘big bad bill’ that will purportedly ‘take 60 million [people] off of health care.’

Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., cited Luke 10, recalling the passage where a lawyer – ‘and it’s always a lawyer causing trouble,’ he quipped – asks Jesus who qualifies as a neighbor and who one ought to care for.

Coons claimed the GOP bill ‘literally takes the food from the mouths of hungry children to pass an enormous tax cut for the very wealthiest [and] is the definition of an immoral bill before this Congress.’

Later, Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga. – reverend of Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta – said the vigil felt like ‘déjà vu.’

Warnock recounted protesting via prayer and singing in the Capitol rotunda in 2017 – alongside former North Carolina NAACP president William Barber II – and said he ‘drew the short straw’ when he, but not Barber, was arrested.

‘As I stood there, I said then what I want to say today: That a budget is not just a fiscal document, it’s a moral document.’

‘Show me your budget and I’ll show you who you think matters and who does not – who you think is dispensable. Right. And we stood there in 2017 making the same point,’ he said, crediting the Capitol Police for arresting them in a professional manner. Warnock recounted that when he was warned of being arrested, he said he had ‘already been arrested.’

‘My mind and my imagination and my heart had been arrested by the heartbeat of children who should not lose their food and who should not lose healthcare in order to give wealthy people a tax cut,’ he said, suggesting the same was true with Republicans’ latest budget bill.

‘Here I am eight years later, having transformed my agitation into legislation.’

‘I’m here today because I still know how to agitate – I still know how to protest. I’m not a senator who used to be a pastor. I’m a pastor in the Senate.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Inditex share price has held steady in the past few years as its business remained resilient despite the rising competition from companies like Temu and Shein. It has jumped to €50, its highest point since March 3, and 192% from its lowest point in 2022. 

Inditex business is doing well

Inditex, the parent company of Zara, Massimo, Dutti, Bershka, and Stradivarius, is doing well despite the ongoing challenges in the global economy. 

According to Bloomberg, the company’s sales jumped by 6% in the five weeks to June 9. This growth rate was higher than what happened in the previous quarter and in line with what analysts were expecting.

The most recent results showed that its sales jumped by 1.5% to €8.3 billion. They grew by 4.2% in constant currency.

Inditex’s profitability continued to boom during the quarter. Its gross profit rose by 1.5% to €5.0 billion, while its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization rose by 1% to €2.4 billion.

Inditex’s business has thrived at a time when many companies in the industry are facing major challenges as the economic slowdown in most countries continues. Retail sales in Europe and the United States have wavered in the past few years.

At the same time, it is facing substantial competition from companies like Temu and Shein that have mastered manufacturing and shipping.

Read more: Dressed for disaster? The harsh impact of Trump’s tariffs on the fashion industry

It is also battling high tariffs in the United States, which accounts for about 18% of global sales. 

Inditex’s strong performance is because of its lower price, well-known brands, its store expansions and refurbishment of existing stores. It is also spending about €1.8 billion to improve its technology and another €9 million to expand its logistics network.

These strategies have helped it to do better than other companies like H&M and Boohoo. Boohoo stock price has crashed by over 80% from its highest point since the pandemic highs.

A key concern among investors is that Inditex, the biggest listed clothing retailer, has become highly overvalued. Its price-to-earnings ratio moved stands at 29, higher than other companies in the industry. This valuation is also higher than the S&P 500 Index, even though its annual growth rate is less than 2%. 

Inditex share price analysis

Inditex stock chart | Source: TradingView

The three-day chart shows that the Inditex stock price formed a double-top pattern at €54.62 in December and February this year. A double-top is one of the most bearish patterns in technical analysis.

It validated this pattern in March when the company published soft financial results. It has now bounced back and moved above the 100-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), a sign that bulls are in control. It also jumped above the double-top’s neckline at €47.78. 

Therefore, the Inditex share price will likely continue rising as bulls target the next key resistance level at €54, up by 10.3% from the current level. A move below the 100-day moving average at $46 will invalidate the bullish view.

The post Here’s why Zara’s Inditex share price is soaring appeared first on Invezz

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem took a shot at Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz for how he handled the 2020 riots in his state, claiming that the Trump administration wouldn’t let history repeat itself in Los Angeles amid immigration protests. 

Noem, who previously served as governor of South Dakota, defended the Trump administration’s decision to deploy thousands of National Guard troops and hundreds of Marines to address the protests in Los Angeles, using Minnesota as an example of what happens when a ‘bad governor’ is in charge. 

‘I was a governor of a neighboring state to Tim Walz and watched him let his city burn,’ Noem told reporters Tuesday. ‘And the president and I have talked about this in the past, and he was not going to let that happen to another city and to another community where a bad governor made a bad decision.’ 

Walz was first elected governor of Minnesota in 2019, leading the state as protests broke out after the death of Black man George Floyd at the hands of a White police officer in 2020. While Walz has said he takes the blame for a delayed response activating the National Guard in his state, he has also said he is proud of how Minnesota reacted. 

‘I’m proud of Minnesota’s response. I’m proud of Minnesota’s first responders who were out there, from firefighters to police to the National Guard to citizens that were out there,’ Walz said in a 2022 gubernatorial debate. 

Walz’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. 

Meanwhile, the Trump administration is dispatching a total of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles after protests broke out Friday stemming from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrests in the city. 

President Donald Trump has gone head-to-head with California’s governor, Democrat Gavin Newsom, over the activation of the troops. While Trump has argued the National Guard troops are necessary to prevent destruction in Los Angeles, Newsom said most of the troops ‘are sitting, unused, in federal buildings without orders.’ 

Additionally, Newsom argued that the move violates state sovereignty because state governors typically oversee National Guard troops. However, Trump invoked a law to place the troops under federal command to bypass Newsom. 

‘This isn’t about public safety,’ Newsom said in a post on X on Monday. ‘It’s about stroking a dangerous President’s ego.’

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The majority of House Democrats voted in favor of allowing non-citizens to participate in Washington, D.C. elections on Tuesday.

The House of Representatives passed a bill led by Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, to prohibit non-U.S. citizens from voting in elections in the nation’s capital.

It passed 266 to 148, with 56 Democrats joining Republicans in passing the measure. One Democrat voted ‘present,’ while 148 voted against the bill.

‘I believe strongly in not having federal overreach, but we have jurisdiction, Congress has jurisdiction over Washington, District of Columbia…and we don’t like to utilize our jurisdiction and our authority, but in this case, they’ve gone too far,’ Pfluger told Fox News Digital in an interview before the vote.

D.C.’s progressive city council passed the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act in 2022, granting non-U.S. citizens the ability to vote in local elections if they’ve lived in the district for at least 30 days.

Noncitizens can also hold local elected office in the D.C. government.

The local measure has been a frequent target of GOP attacks, with Republican national security hawks raising alarms about the possibility of hostile foreign agents participating in D.C. elections.

But progressive Democrats like Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla., who spoke out against the bill on Tuesday afternoon, have dismissed that as an implausible scenario. 

‘Republicans claim that Congress has a constitutional duty to legislate on local D.C. matters, but this is historically and legally incorrect. Republicans legislate on local D.C. matters only when they think they can score political points, such as by demonizing immigrants,’ Frost said during debate on the House floor.

‘They only bring it up to the floor when they think they can score political points, taking away the democratic rights of people here in D.C. and home rule.’

Frost also argued that it was ‘highly unlikely’ foreign officials would vote in those elections, claiming they would have to ‘renounce their right to vote in their home country’ and because ‘D.C. has no authority in federal matters.’

But Pfluger, who spoke with Fox News Digital before the vote, was optimistic that it would get at least some Democratic support.

He noted that 52 Democrats voted for the bill when it passed the House in the previous Congress. It was never taken up in the formerly Democrat-controlled Senate, however.

‘It’s hard to go back to your district as a Democrat and say, yeah, I want foreign agents to be able to vote in our elections – ‘Oh yeah, it’s not federal elections,’ some may say. But it has an impact on the way the city is run,’ Pfluger said.

‘This could be Russian embassy personnel, they could be Chinese embassy personnel – a number of folks. It’s just wrong. It goes against the fabric of our society,’ he added.

Another bill receiving a vote on Tuesday is legislation that would grant D.C. police the ability to negotiate punishments via collective bargaining, and would help shield the capital’s police force from at least some liability by installing a statute of limitations against the Metropolitan Police Department. 

That legislation was introduced by New York Republican Rep. Andrew Garbarino.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Trump’s tariffs will remain in effect for now after a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday to pause a lower court decision that had blocked them. 

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted the stay and scheduled an expedited review of the case, which centers on whether Trump exceeded his authority under federal law.

The case involves challenges from five small businesses and a coalition of states who argue that President Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs was unlawful. 

The U.S. Court of International Trade sided with the plaintiffs earlier this year, issuing an order to block the tariffs. That decision is now on hold pending further review.

The Federal Circuit found that both sides raised substantial arguments and that a stay was appropriate under the legal standards used to evaluate such motions. 

The court’s brief order noted that the stay was necessary to preserve the status quo while the appeal proceeds. The case will now be heard by the full bench of active judges in an en banc session, a rare move reserved for matters of exceptional legal significance.

Oral arguments are scheduled for July 31 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 201 at the Federal Circuit courthouse in Washington, D.C.

The Liberty Justice Center, which represents the five businesses, criticized the court’s decision to allow the tariffs to remain temporarily but welcomed the accelerated review.

‘We’re disappointed the federal circuit allowed the unlawful tariffs to remain in place temporarily,’ said Jeffrey Schwab, Senior Counsel and Director of Litigation at the Liberty Justice Center. 

‘It’s important to note that every court to rule on the merits so far has found these tariffs unlawful, and we have faith that this court will likewise see what is plain as day: that IEEPA does not allow the president to impose whatever tax he wants whenever he wants. We are glad the federal circuit recognized the importance of this case, and agreed to hear it before the full court on an expedited schedule.’

The full opinion can be read here.

White House spokesman Kush Desai defended the Trump administration’s executive powers in a statement to Fox News Digital, saying it welcomed the US Circuit Court of Appeals’ stay order.

‘The Trump administration is legally using the powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address our country’s national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking. The US Circuit Court of Appeals’ stay order is a welcome development, and we look forward to ultimately prevailing in court,’ Desai said.
 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Donald Trump has escalated his sudden rupture with Elon Musk by implying the government could sever ties with the tech titan’s businesses.

‘The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it,’ Trump wrote Thursday on Truth Social.

Various estimates have been put forward about just how much Musk’s firms, primarily SpaceX and Tesla, benefit from U.S. government contracts and subsidies. The Washington Post has put the figure at $38 billion, with SpaceX President and COO Gwynne Shotwell estimating that company alone benefits from $22 billion in federal spending. Reuters has reported that the true figure is classified because of the nature of many of the contracts Musk’s firms are under.

NASA relies on SpaceX to ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station. The agency’s only other option at the moment is to pay around $90 million for a seat aboard Russia’s Soyuz capsule.

Last year, SpaceX was selected to develop a vehicle capable of safely de-orbiting the International Space Station in 2030, when NASA and its partner space agencies agreed to end operation of the orbiting laboratory. SpaceX is also expected to play a major role in NASA’s efforts to return astronauts to the moon and eventually travel beyond to Mars.

Later Thursday afternoon, Musk posted that he would begin ‘decommissioning’ SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft, which regularly flies astronauts and cargo to the ISS, in response to Trump’s threat.

NASA spokesperson Bethany Stevens said the agency ‘will continue to execute upon the President’s vision for the future of space.’

‘We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the President’s objectives in space are met,’ she said in a statement on X.

Tesla, meanwhile, has benefited from approximately $11.4 billion in total regulatory credits aimed at boosting electric-vehicle purchases, though that figure also includes state-level subsidies. Musk has claimed he no longer needs the credit, which he says now primarily benefits rivals.

Following Trump’s threat, shares in Tesla, which had already fallen 8% on Thursday as the tit-for-tat escalated on social media, declined as much as 15% following Trump’s post. SpaceX is privately held and its shares do not trade on the open market.

Trump’s warning came as part of a stunning exchange with Musk — who spent more than $250 million to help him get elected — that erupted into public view.

Earlier in the day, president told reporters in the Oval Office that he was disappointed in Musk’s criticism of the Republican policy bill that is making its way through Congress. Musk has blasted the bill, calling it a ‘disgusting abomination,’ amid concerns it would worsen the U.S. fiscal deficit.

Musk, who officially left his White House role last week to spend more time on his companies, spent much of Thursday launching into a tirade on X, his social media platform, where he posted a variety of critiques of Trump, the bill and other Republican politicians.

A make-good on Trump’s threat would come at a sensitive time for Tesla, which has seen global sales plunge partly in response to Musk’s very involvement with the Trump campaign. Year to date, its shares are down some 25%.

Trump’s warning also raises the specter that Trump could resurface pending government investigations into Musk’s firms. According to a report in April from Democratic staff of the Senate Homeland Security Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Musk’s firms were facing $2.37 billion in potential federal liabilities when Trump took office in January.

Since then, many of those actions have been paused or outright dismissed alongside the rise of the previously Musk-helmed Department of Government Efficiency, which gutted many of the agencies looking into Musk’s businesses.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS