Author

admin

Browsing

Lawmakers from across the aisle are reacting to President Donald Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ passing a key Senate vote on Saturday night.

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., who flipped his vote from a ‘no’ to ‘yes’ in dramatic fashion, said in a statement that the mammoth bill is a ‘necessary first step’ to fiscal sustainability and cleaning up the mess left by the Biden administration.

‘Biden and the Democrats left behind enormous messes that we are trying to clean up – an open border, wars, and massive deficits,’ Johnson said. ‘After working for weeks with President Trump and his highly capable economic team, I am convinced that he views this as a necessary first step and will support my efforts to help put America on a path to fiscal sustainability.’

The 51-49 vote went along party lines, with only Sens. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., and Rand Paul, R-Ky., voting against unlocking a marathon 20-hour debate on the bill.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., was among the Democrats against what he called a ‘radical’ bill.

‘Senate Republicans are scrambling to pass a radical bill, released to the public in the dead of night, praying the American people don’t realize what’s in it,’ Schumer said in a statement. ‘If Senate Republicans won’t tell the American people what’s in this bill, then Democrats are going to force this chamber to read it from start to finish.’

The bill will not immediately be debated thanks to Senate Democrats’ plan to force the reading of the entire, 940-page legislative behemoth on the Senate floor.

Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., however, said he was ‘proud’ to work with Trump on the bill and ‘put our nation on a path to balance the budget after years of Democrats’ reckless spending.’

Trump has said that he wants the bill, which must pass the Senate before being sent to the House for a vote, on his desk by July 4.

Trump called the Senate vote a ‘great victory’ and directly praised Sens. Johnson, Scott, Mike Lee, R-Ariz., and Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., in a post on his Truth Social platform.

‘They, along with all of the other Republican Patriots who voted for the Bill, are people who truly love our Country!’ Trump wrote. ‘As President of the USA, I am proud of them all, and look forward to working with them to GROW OUR ECONOMY, REDUCE WASTEFUL SPENDING, SECURE OUR BORDER, FIGHT FOR OUR MILITARY/VETS, ENSURE THAT OUR MEDICAID SYSTEM HELPS THOSE WHO TRULY NEED IT, PROTECT OUR SECOND AMENDMENT, AND SO MUCH MORE. GOD BLESS AMERICA &, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!’

In a second post, Trump wrote, ‘VERY PROUD OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY TONIGHT. GOD BLESS YOU ALL! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!’

Fox News Digital’s Alex Miller contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

London is likely to experience scorching heatwaves this weekend, with temperatures climbing and peaking on Monday, according to the Met Office

Rising temperatures coincide with the start of play at the All England Club on Monday, potentially making it Wimbledon’s hottest ever opening.

Warm and humid weekend

A cloudy start is expected on Saturday, particularly in western areas where some rain or drizzle is likely, especially on upslopes, the Met Office said. 

However, the day will see an improvement across much of the UK. A band of cloud and rain is expected to move northward across central UK on Sunday.

Following a sweltering weekend, Monday’s temperatures are forecast to hit the mid-30s Celsius. This presents a challenging day for players, organizers, ticket holders, and those in queues. 

The Met Office said in an update:

The hottest day of the current spell is expected on Monday, with temperatures widely exceeding 30°C in central and eastern England, possibly reaching 34°C in London and towards Cambridge.

At 29.3C, the previous record temperature for the beginning of the grass court Grand Slam was recorded in 2001, according to a Reuters report.

Monday’s anticipated heatwave is predicted to exceed the 2015 tournament record of 35.7 degrees, a year when on-court temperatures were considerably higher.

A 10-minute break in play will likely be triggered by Wimbledon’s heat rule when the Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) reaches or exceeds 30.1 degrees Celsius.

The Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) will be measured at three distinct times: prior to the start of play, and subsequently at 14:00 and 17:00. 

This measurement comprehensively considers several environmental variables, including ambient temperature, humidity, wind conditions, and the angle of the sun.

For best-of-three set matches, the rule applies after the second set. In best-of-five set matches, it applies after the third set. 

Players may leave the court during this break but are not permitted to receive coaching or medical treatment.

Impact on quality 

Chris Tyler, an environmental physiology researcher at the University of Roehampton, welcomed the heat rule but noted that the heat could negatively impact the quality of matches.

“It’s good that they have a rule that uses the Wet Bulb Globe Temperature but what it doesn’t factor in is what the players are doing,” Tyler was quoted in the Reuters report.

“Most of the heat risk for players relates to their actual body temperature increasing, 80% of their body temperature is related to what they’re doing.

He also suggested that applying iced towels to the back of the neck during changeovers might not be the most effective method for players to cool down.

“It’s like a football team giving a pain-killing injection to their star player before a cup final, it makes them feel better but the injury is still there,” he said.

He further said that if it was core body temperature that they wanted to bring down, the towels were not really going to do much. 

Source: Met Office

Tyler added that the feet and the forearms had a lot of blood vessels and cooling them down was quite a good method of heat exchange, and also the groin where they had the femoral artery.

Plans

Wimbledon organisers are implementing precautions to safeguard the general public and staff, including ball boys and girls (BBGs), against the anticipated heat, while elite players are expected to manage these conditions.

A club statement said:

Adverse weather is a key consideration in our planning for The Championships, and we are prepared for the predicted hot weather, with comprehensive plans in place for guests, players, staff and the BBGs.

Additional free water refill stations will be available throughout the grounds. Real-time weather alerts will be broadcast on large screens and published on the tournament’s website.

To combat the heat, staff shifts will be adjusted, and “shade-mapping” will be implemented to help people find respite from the sun.

Following Monday and Tuesday’s extreme heat, temperatures are forecast to fall to the low to mid-20s for the remainder of the week, with a likelihood of rain showers, according to the Met Office.

The post London braces for scorching heatwave, hottest start to Wimbledon expected appeared first on Invezz

Snap Inc (NYSE: SNAP), the parent company of Snapchat, has endured a brutal comedown since its 2021 peak, with shares down nearly 90% from their all-time high.

But beneath the rubble lies a social media firm quietly rebuilding its growth engine – and investors might want to take notice.

From cutting-edge advertising technology to rapidly growing user engagement and a rock-bottom valuation, Snap stock is starting to look like a gift worth unwrapping.

Ad-tech and AI: two major tailwinds for Snap stock

Snap’s core business, digital advertising, was hit hard by Apple Inc 2021 privacy changes, which disrupted user tracking and ad targeting.

But Snap didn’t stand still. It rebuilt its ad infrastructure using machine learning, and the results are starting to show.

In Q1 2025, app-install campaigns on Snapchat saw a year-on-year increase of 30% in conversions from Apple devices, signaling the new ad engine is gaining traction.

The company also rolled out an automated bidding system that helps advertisers lower their cost-per-action while boosting return on ad spend.

Early adopters have reportedly seen a 16% boost to returns and a 32% decline in cost-per-action.

Meanwhile, Snap’s Sponsored AI Lenses – augmented reality ads powered by generative AI – are driving deeper engagement and brand interaction.

According to Zacks Equity Research, these immersive formats can boost impressions by up to 45% in a single day, adding to the list of reasons to buy Snap stock at current levels.

Revenue diversification to help SNAP shares in 2025

Investors should note that Snapchat’s user base looks far from saturated in 2025.

The social media app averaged 460 million DAUs this year in Q1 – a record high – helping a great deal in keeping advertisers interested in SNAP.

At the same time, the NYSE listed firm remains fully committed to diversifying its revenue beyond advertising as well, with initiatives like Snapchat+ that now boasts nearly 15 million subscribers and is on a $600 million annualised run rate.

Additionally, Snap Inc is seeing traction with its “My AI” chatbot powered by the Gemini models.

A 55% year-on-year increase in My AI’s daily active users in the first quarter suggests the company’s artificial intelligence investments are resonating well with the users.

Together, these innovations aimed at diversifying beyond traditional ad revenue and building a more resilient business model could unlock significant further upside in SNAP shares moving forward.

Snap stock is trading at a mouthwatering valuation

Perhaps the most compelling reason to consider loading up on Snap stock right now is its valuation.

At its 2021 peak, Snap traded at a sky-high price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 40.

Today, that figure has collapsed to just 2.5 – near the lowest in the company’s public history.

And that’s despite a 14% revenue growth and a whopping 137% increase in adjusted EBITDA in Q1.

Snap’s gross margins remain healthy, and its operating expenses grew just 2% in the latest quarter.

While the company is still posting GAAP losses, it’s narrowing them significantly.

For long-term investors, this combination of improving fundamentals and depressed valuation could be a rare opportunity.

The post Snap stock: 3 reasons why it looks better than a Christmas treat right now appeared first on Invezz

The U.S. stock market is presently witnessing an extraordinary period, with the S&P 500 Index trading at all-time highs.

This remarkable rally has seen approximately $10 trillion added to the value of U.S. stocks since the index was on the verge of a bear market just two months prior.

This market buoyancy persists despite a multitude of looming risks, including President Donald Trump’s impending tariff deadline, ongoing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, and increasing economic uncertainty.

Kate Moore, the recently appointed chief investment officer of Citigroup Inc.’s wealth division, articulated this sentiment in a recent interview with Bloomberg, stating, “If I’m honest, I’ve been a little uncomfortable with this rally.”

She highlighted a series of “warning flags” that, in her view, are not adequately impacting investor sentiment or receiving sufficient attention.

Emerging cracks and shifting expectations

A key area of concern, as identified by Moore, lies in the moderation of corporate earnings expectations.

At the beginning of the year, Wall Street analysts had projected a robust nearly 13% increase in profits for S&P 500 companies, according to data from Bloomberg Intelligence.

However, in less than six months, this forecast has been significantly revised downwards to a more modest 7.1%.

Concurrently, the composition of the stock market’s gains indicates a growing concentration around a limited number of companies.

While the standard S&P 500 Index continues its ascent, largely propelled by the strong performance of major technology entities such as Nvidia Corp., Microsoft Corp., and Meta Platforms Inc., its equal-weighted counterpart remains 3% below the record level it achieved half a year ago.

Moore, who assumed her role as CIO at Citi’s wealth business in February, after a tenure as head of thematic strategy for BlackRock’s $50 billion global allocation business, also voiced reservations about the market’s apparent dismissal of potential tariff impacts.

She further characterized the enthusiasm surrounding prospective interest rate cuts as potentially misplaced.

Policy uncertainty and economic headwinds

As President Trump’s self-imposed July 9 tariff deadline rapidly approaches with limited progress on trade deals, Moore suggests that investors might be underestimating the financial repercussions of these levies.

She underscored globalization’s significant role in the margin expansion observed over the past two decades, implying that companies will indeed experience the effects of new tariffs.

Furthermore, Moore cautioned against excessive optimism regarding interest rate reductions, explaining that such policy adjustments would likely stem from a response not only to cooling inflation but also to a broader deceleration in overall economic activity.

She emphasized that a “cooling overall activity is not the perfect environment for massive risk on.”

Wall Street analysts now anticipate that second-quarter year-over-year profit growth for S&P 500 companies will be the weakest in two years, projected at 2.8%, according to Bloomberg Intelligence data.

This economic softness is exemplified by FedEx Corp.’s recent warning of lower-than-expected profits for the current quarter, attributed to the ongoing impact of the trade war.

Additionally, economic data indicates that U.S. consumer spending in the first quarter experienced its slowest growth since the onset of the pandemic, driven by a sharp deceleration in outlays for various services.

Moore’s primary concern revolves around a lack of policy clarity, observing that “The longer that uncertainty lasts — the longer we have flip-flops on policy and wait-and-see mileposts keeps moving — the more that leads companies to pull back on some of the investment and capital expenditures and hiring.”

Strategic adjustments and enduring investment themes

Despite these broader economic apprehensions, Moore maintains a degree of confidence in the sustained strength of earnings within the artificial intelligence and technology sectors.

She notes that these investment themes have consistently demonstrated resilience across various economic cycles.

Moreover, even amidst a potentially deteriorating economic environment, she considers U.S. large-cap companies to be “the most attractive house on the street” in terms of available investment options.

Since joining Citi Wealth, Moore has initiated several strategic adjustments to the firm’s investment portfolios.

These changes include a reallocation of assets, shifting from small-cap companies to large-cap entities, a decision predicated on the expectation of a more challenging environment for smaller firms in terms of both growth prospects and profit margins.

She also disclosed the addition of gold to the portfolios, characterizing its inclusion as a “ballast” — a measure to provide stability and act as a hedge against market volatility.

The post Citi Wealth CIO says traders ignoring warning signs in S&P 500 appeared first on Invezz

Following an exciting rally in recent months, shares of JPMorgan and Bank of America may now be running on fumes only, according to a senior Baird analyst.

David George recommends a more cautious stance on the two money center banks since their risk-reward profiles have become increasingly unattractive as valuations stretch and expectations soar.

Despite their reputations as “gold standard” institutions, the case for trimming exposure – or even selling outright – is gaining traction.

Why it may now be time to sell JPMorgan stock

JPM has handily outperformed the S&P 500 index this year, with shares currently up 35% versus their year-to-date low in early April.

But that outperformance did come at a cost – “valuation”.  

JPMorgan shares are currently going for a record 2.9 times tangible book value and a forward P/E ratio of 15.5, indicating a lot of the good news is already baked in.

On Friday, David George downgraded JPM stock to “underperform” with a price target of $235 indicating potential downside of about 18% from current levels.

According to the Baird analyst, JPMorgan continues to boast an exceptionally strong balance sheet and retains its dominance in the financial services industry – but “future returns will likely not be what they’ve been the last several years at these valuation levels.”

Simply put, this best-in-class franchise will likely prove a poor investment given the expectations are too high.

With capital markets reopening and deregulation providing tailwinds, the bullish narrative is compelling – but perhaps too widely embraced. George’s contrarian view is that valuation still matters, and in JPM’s case, it may be signaling a ceiling rather than a floor.

Why it may now be time to sell Bank of America stock

BofA has also enjoyed a solid run in recent months, with shares up some 12% currently versus the April low. Still, David George downgraded the bank stock today to “neutral”.

His $52 price target on the Bank of America shares implies modest upside, but not nearly enough to justify fresh buying at current levels.

Baird had previously upgraded BAC in April – believing the market was underestimating the firm’s earnings power. But with the stock now reflecting improved net interest margins and a more favorable capital markets backdrop, he believes the easy gains are behind it.

“We remain huge fans of the BAC franchise,” he wrote, “but feel like the stock is largely reflecting it here.”

In short, while BofA stock may not be overvalued to the same extent as JPM, it’s no longer the bargain it once was – and that makes it a hold at best, or a sell for those seeking better asymmetric opportunities.

All in all, with both stocks trading near highs and sentiment running hot, now may be the time to take profits before gravity sets in, George concluded.

The post JPM, BAC – two gold standard bank stocks you should ‘sell’ now appeared first on Invezz

Tennis icon Roger Federer has now achieved the rare distinction of becoming a billionaire, placing him among a select few athletes to reach this financial milestone.

While his illustrious 24-year playing career, which concluded in 2022, saw him accumulate $130.6 million in prize money through 20 Grand Slam victories between 2003 and 2018, the predominant portion of his vast wealth has been derived from substantial sponsorship agreements and a strategic investment in a Swiss sneaker company.

According to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, Federer’s net worth stands at approximately $1.3 billion, positioning him alongside other sports legends.

For context, Michael Jordan’s wealth was estimated at $3.5 billion following the sale of his stake in the Charlotte Hornets in 2023, and Tiger Woods’ net worth was calculated at about $1.36 billion last year by Bloomberg.

The power of endorsements and strategic investments

Sources close to Federer, who spoke on condition of anonymity, indicate his net worth is considerably above $1 billion.

Bloomberg’s valuation methodology incorporates Federer’s career earnings, investment returns, and endorsement deals, adjusted for prevailing Swiss tax rates and market performance.

A significant aspect of Federer’s enduring financial success lies in the longevity of many of his commercial partnerships.

He has maintained multi-decade relationships with prominent brands such as Credit Suisse Bank (now UBS Group AG), luxury watchmaker Rolex, and Swiss chocolatier Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprungli AG.

Beyond individual deals, Federer has meticulously cultivated a robust advisory network.

This includes Team8, the management company he co-founded in 2013 with his long-time agent Tony Godsick, as well as the Swiss firm Format A AG, which assists in managing various investments and his charitable foundation.

Sports analyst Bob Dorfman commented on Federer’s market appeal, noting, “Federer is totally scandal-free. He never says the wrong thing… But in terms of marketability, he’s been one of tennis’s best.”

A lucrative transition and an accidental windfall

Interestingly, some of Federer’s most financially significant deals materialized towards the latter stages of his playing career.

A notable example is his long-standing contract with Nike Inc., originally signed in 1996, which came up for renewal around 2018.

As tennis was not a primary focus for Nike, Godsick explored alternative partners.

This led to a substantial 10-year, $300 million offer from Uniqlo, a brand owned by Japan’s Fast Retailing Co., to become one of their flagship sports icons.

This agreement was particularly advantageous given Federer was 37 and nearing retirement; the deal included no obligations, even if he ceased playing, making it a highly attractive proposition.

However, even more impactful than his Uniqlo deal was an investment stemming from an unexpected introduction.

Federer’s wife inadvertently initiated the connection by purchasing a pair of sneakers from the emerging Swiss brand On.

Founded in 2010, On had gained recognition for its high-end jogging shoes featuring a distinctive sole, a design that originated from co-founder Olivier Bernhard’s prototype involving garden hose offcuts taped to his trainers.

Since Uniqlo does not produce footwear, Federer was free to pursue a shoe sponsor.

A self-professed sneaker enthusiast with a collection exceeding 250 pairs (excluding those used for playing), Federer initiated a meeting with On’s founders in Zurich.

Godsick also had a pre-existing connection, having made an angel investment in the company.

This led to a deal where Federer acquired an approximate 3% stake in On Holding AG and contributed to shoe design.

On is now valued at nearly $17 billion, which, according to Bloomberg’s wealth index, makes Federer’s stake worth at least $500 million.

Federer has, to date, avoided overexposure through extensive commentary roles or questionable sponsorships.

His recent public engagements include waving the French flag to commence the Le Mans endurance car race and launching a new Uniqlo clothing collection in Paris.

He is also expected to attend Wimbledon, the site of many of his greatest triumphs, when the tournament begins next week.

The post Roger Federer joins elite ranks of athlete billionaires appeared first on Invezz

President Donald Trump has secured commitments for a record-shattering $1.4 billion since Election Day 2024, Fox News Digital has learned. 

And advisors say he will be ‘an even more dominant force’ for Republicans in the 2026 midterms. 

The president’s political operation, including the cash on hand at the Republican National Committee, has raised a historic $900 million since November, and other commitments will bring the total to more than $1.4 billion.

Fox News Digital has learned the funds will be used to help Republicans keep their House and Senate majorities.

Republicans control the House with a 220-215 majority and control the Senate with a 53-47 majority. 

Sources say the funds will also be used for whatever the president deems ‘necessary and appropriate.’

‘After securing a historic victory in his re-election campaign in 2024, President Trump has continued to break records, including fundraising numbers that have positioned him to be an even more dominant force going into the midterms and beyond,’ President Trump’s senior advisor and National Finance Director Meredith O’Rourke told Fox News Digital. 

The president headlined a major donor event in Washington, D.C., in April for the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), which is the House GOP’s campaign arm. That fundraiser hauled in at least $10 million for the NRCC, a source familiar with the event told Fox News.

In March, Vice President JD Vance was tapped to serve as the RNC finance chair, the first time in the history of the GOP a sitting vice president is serving in the role.

Vance pledged to work to ‘fully enact the MAGA mandate’ and expand the Republican majority in Congress in 2026.

Fox News Digital’s Paul Steinhauser contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Senate Republicans unveiled their long-awaited version of President Donald Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill,’ but its survival is not guaranteed.

Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., revealed the stitched-together text of the colossal bill late Firday night.

The final product from the upper chamber is the culmination of a roughly month-long sprint to take the House GOP’s version of the bill and mold and change it. The colossal package includes separate pieces and parts from 10 Senate committees. With the introduction of the bill, a simple procedural hurdle must be passed in order to begin the countdown to final passage.

When that comes remains an open question. Senate Republicans left their daily lunch on Friday under the assumption that a vote could be teed up as early as noon on Saturday.

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., told Fox News Digital that he had ‘strongly encouraged’ Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., to put the bill on the floor for a vote Saturday afternoon. 

‘If you’re unhappy with that, you’re welcome to fill out a hurt feelings report, and we will review it carefully later,’ Kennedy said. ‘But in the meantime, it’s time to start voting.’

But Senate Republicans’ desire to impose their will on the package and make changes to already divisive policy tweaks in the House GOP’s offering could doom the bill and derail Thune’s ambitious timeline to get it on Trump’s desk by the July 4 deadline.

However, Thune has remained firm that lawmakers would stay on course and deliver the bill to Trump by Independence Day. 

When asked if he had the vote to move the package forward, Thune said ‘we’ll find out tomorrow.’

But it wasn’t just lawmakers who nearly derailed the bill. The Senate parliamentarian, the true final arbiter of the bill, ruled that numerous GOP-authored provisions did not pass muster with Senate rules.

Any item in the ‘big, beautiful bill’ must comport with the Byrd Rule, which governs the budget reconciliation process and allows for a party in power to ram legislation through the Senate while skirting the 60-vote filibuster threshold. 

That sent lawmakers back to the drawing board on a slew of policy tweaks, including the Senate’s changes to the Medicaid provider tax rate, cost-sharing for food benefits and others. 

Republican leaders, the White House and disparate factions within the Senate and House GOP have been meeting to find middle ground on other pain points, like tweaking the caps on state and local tax (SALT) deductions.

While the controversial Medicaid provider tax rate change remained largely the same, a $25 billion rural hospital stabilization fund was included in the bill to help attract possible holdouts that have raised concerns that the rate change would shutter rural hospitals throughout the country. 

On the SALT front, there appeared to be a breakthrough on Friday. A source told Fox News that the White House and House were on board with a new plan that would keep the $40,000 cap from the House’s bill and have it reduced back down to $10,000 after five years. 

But Senate Republicans are the ones that must accept it at this stage. Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., has acted as the mediator in those negotiations, and said that he was unsure if any of his colleagues ‘love it.’ 

‘But I think, as I’ve said before, I want to make sure we have enough that people can vote for than to vote against,’ he said. 

Still, a laundry list of other pocket issues and concerns over just how deep spending cuts in the bill go have conservatives and moderates in the House GOP and Senate pounding their chests and vowing to vote against the bill.

Republican leaders remain adamant that they will finish the mammoth package and are gambling that some lawmakers standing against the bill will buckle under the pressure from the White House and the desire to leave Washington for a short break.

Once a motion to proceed is passed, which only requires a simple majority, then begins 20 hours of debate evenly divided between both sides of the aisle.

Democratic lawmakers are expected to spend the entirety of their 10 allotted hours, while Republicans will likely clock in well below their limit. From there starts the ‘vote-a-rama’ process, when lawmakers can submit a near-endless number of amendments to the bill. Democrats will likely try to extract as much pain as possible with messaging amendments that won’t actually pass but will add more and more time to the process.

Once that is complete, lawmakers will move to a final vote. If successful, the ‘big, beautiful bill’ will again make its way back to the House, where House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., will again have to corral dissidents to support the legislation. It barely advanced last month, squeaking by on a one-vote margin. 

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent hammered on the importance of passing Trump’s bill on time. He met with Senate Republicans during their closed-door lunch and spread the message that advancing the colossal tax package would go a long way to giving businesses more certainty in the wake of the president’s tariffs. 

‘We need certainty,’ he said. ‘With so much uncertainty, and having the bill on the president’s desk by July 4 will give us great tax certainty, and I believe, accelerate the economy in the third quarter of the year.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A Senate Democrat’s push to put a check on President Donald Trump’s powers and reaffirm the Senate’s war authority was shut down by lawmakers in the upper chamber Thursday.

Sen. Tim Kaine’s war powers resolution, which would have required Congress to debate and vote on whether the president could declare war, or strike Iran, was struck down in the Senate on a largely party-line vote, save for Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., a staunch advocate of Israel who supported Trump’s strike on the Islamic Republic, and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who has been vocal in his thoughts about congressional war powers in recent days.

Earlier in the week, the Virginia Democrat vowed to move ahead with the resolution despite a fragile ceasefire brokered between Israel and Iran following weekend strikes on the Islamic Republic’s key nuclear facilities that were not given the green-light by Congress.

Kaine argued that the ceasefire gave his resolution more credence and breathing room to properly debate the role that Congress plays when it comes to authorizing both war and attacks abroad.

He said ahead of the vote on the Senate floor that he came to Washington to ensure that the country does not again get into another ‘unnecessary’ war, and invoked the rush to approve war powers for President George W. Bush over two decades ago to engage with Iraq.

‘I think the events of this week have demonstrated that war is too big to consign to the decisions of any one person,’ Kaine said. 

Indeed, his resolution became a focal point for a debate that has raged on Capitol Hill since Israel began its bombing campaign against Iran: whether the strikes like those carried out during Operation Midnight Hammer constituted an act of war that required congressional approval, or if Trump’s decision was under his constitutional authority as commander in chief.  

Senate Republicans have widely argued that Trump was well within his purview, while most Senate Democrats raised constitutional concerns about the president’s ability to carry out a strike without lawmakers weighing in. 

Experts have argued, too, that Trump was within his executive authority to strike Iran. 

The Constitution divides war powers between Congress and the White House, giving lawmakers the sole power to declare war, while the president acts as the commander in chief directing the military. 

And nearly two centuries later, at the height of the Vietnam War, the War Powers Resolution of 1973 was born, which sought to further define those roles.

But the most impact lawmakers could have is through the power of the purse, and Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky, who plays a large role in controlling the purse strings as the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, had a sharp message against Kaine’s resolution. 

McConnell used instances where Democratic presidents over the last three decades have used their authority for limited engagements in Kosovo, Libya, Syria and Yemen, and questioned why ‘isolationists’ would consider the strike on Iran to kneecap its nuclear program a mistake. 

‘I have not heard the frequent flyers on War Powers resolutions reckon seriously with these questions,’ he said. ‘Until they do, efforts like this will remain divorced from both strategic and constitutional reality.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio held his first official meeting in Washington, D.C., with the families of the hostages still held by Hamas in Gaza amid the terror group’s ongoing war with Israel.

Rubio reaffirmed the Trump administration’s commitment to securing the release of all 50 remaining hostages, according to a press release from The Hostages and Missing Families Forum.

The meeting featured Moshe Lavi, brother-in-law of hostage Omri Miran; Ilay David, brother of hostage Evyatar David; Tzur Goldin, brother of Lt. Hadar Goldin; and recently released hostage Iair Horn, whose brother Eitan Horn remains in captivity.

Rubio’s wife, Jeanette, and son, Anthony, were also at the meeting.

During the meeting, the secretary told the families that true victory in Gaza would only be realized when all the hostages returned home, according to the press release.

He also noted that the U.S. government has already demonstrated its ability to lead significant initiatives in the Middle East. He further argued that Israel has achieved victories in Iran and Lebanon and is capable of defeating Hamas.

The families stressed that this is a critical window of opportunity to bring the remaining hostages home in one comprehensive deal rather than phases or partial agreements as has been the case in Israel’s previous hostage deals with Hamas, the press release said.

They expressed trust in the Trump administration to act with urgency and determination to free the remaining people in Hamas’ captivity.

‘We’ve waited long enough,’ the families said. ‘It’s time to make brave decisions and bring all our loved ones back—all at once.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS