NASA is once again considering Elon Musk ally Jared Isaacman for the administration’s top role.

The private astronaut had been nominated for the role earlier this year, but the White House yanked that nomination as cracks formed in President Donald Trump’s relationship with Musk.

‘Secretary Duffy and Jared Isaacman had an excellent meeting,’ NASA press secretary Bethany Stephens first told Reuters in a statement this week.

She added in a statement to Fox News Digital: ‘At President Trump’s direction, Secretary [Sean] Duffy in his capacity as acting NASA Administrator, is meeting with and vetting several candidates for the permanent role.’ 

The nomination was pulled on May 31, one day after the White House held a farewell press conference for Musk, the SpaceX and Tesla CEO who led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) efforts.

Trump announced on social media at the time he was pulling the nomination for Isaacman, a commercial astronaut and founder and CEO of payment processing company Shift4 Payments after ‘a thorough review of prior associations.’

Trump also said he would unveil a ‘new Nominee who will be Mission aligned, and put America First in Space.’

Isaacman’s affiliations with Musk include being an investor in SpaceX, in addition to leading two private spaceflight missions with SpaceX, including Inspiration4. The 2021 Inspiration4 mission was the first time an all-civilian crew orbited Earth.

The billionaire investor flew twice to space in the company’s capsules.

He had spent months navigating the Senate’s confirmation process at the time his nomination was yanked, balancing NASA’s multi-billion-dollar strategy to return to the moon first and its focus on Mars. NASA recently unveiled plans to develop a nuclear reactor on the moon. 

Isaacman said he suspected his ties to Musk were part of the decision, noting the call came the same day Musk’s tenure with DOGE concluded.

‘I don’t need to play dumb on this,’ Isaacman said on the ‘All In’ podcast. ‘I don’t think that the timing was much of a coincidence, that there were other changes going on the same day.

‘There were some people that had some axes to grind, I guess, and I was a good, visible target.’

Tensions between Trump and Musk came to a head when Musk came out against the ‘Big Beautiful Bill,’ Trump’s massive tax and spending package.

Ties between the pair are seemingly on the mend. They shook hands and chatted at Charlie Kirk’s funeral in Glendale Arizona last month.

‘We had a little conversation,’ Trump said. ‘We had a very good relationship, but it was nice that he came over.’

The top Democrat in the House of Representatives attacked White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt with a slew of insults on Friday.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., accused Republican officials of unjustly going after Democrats amid a controversy over a swastika flag found in a House GOP lawmaker’s office this week, though the lawmaker denied he or his staff played any role. Jeffries made the comments during a press conference with reporters on day 17 of the ongoing government shutdown.

‘You’ve got Karoline Leavitt, who’s sick. She’s out of control. And I’m not sure whether she’s just demented, ignorant, a stone-cold liar, or all of the above,’ Jeffries said.

‘But the notion that an official White House spokesperson would say that the Democratic Party consists of terrorists, violent criminals, and undocumented immigrants makes no sense, that this is what the American people are getting from the Trump administration in the middle of a shutdown.’

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for a response.

Jeffries had been asked about the swastika, which was reportedly embedded into a small American flag that was hanging on a cork board in the office of Rep. Dave Taylor, R-Ohio. It was first reported by a local Ohio social media reporter who goes by the X handle ‘The Rooster.’

Taylor said in a statement to Fox News that several offices were targeted with the flag, which he said was the work of an ‘unidentified group’ in a coordinated opposition campaign.

‘New details have emerged from a coordinated investigation into the vile symbol that appeared in my office. Numerous Republican offices have confirmed that they were targeted by an unidentified group or individual who distributed American flags bearing a similar symbol, which were initially indistinguishable from an ordinary American flag to the naked eye,’ Taylor said. 

‘After a full-scale internal investigation, I am confident that no employee of this office would knowingly display such a despicable image, and the flag in question was taken down immediately upon the discovery of the obscured symbol it bore.’

It’s not immediately clear why the events made Jeffries invoke Leavitt specifically, however.

Tensions have run high on both sides as the shutdown drags on, and the standoff shows no signs of slowing down.

In fact, it’s expected to roll into its fourth week after Senate Democrats blocked the GOP’s federal funding measure for a fourth time on Thursday before leaving Washington for the weekend.

Republicans put forward last month a seven-week extension of fiscal year (FY) 2025 funding levels, called a continuing resolution (CR), aimed at giving congressional negotiators more time to strike a long-term deal for FY2026.

But Democrats in the House and Senate were infuriated by being sidelined in those talks. The majority of Democrats are refusing to accept any deal that does not include serious healthcare concessions, at least extending COVID-19 pandemic-era Obamacare subsidies that are set to expire at the end of this year.

Fox News’ Chad Pergram contributed to this report.

Former White House National Security Advisor John Bolton pleaded not guilty Friday to all 18 counts related to the improper handling of classified materials after surrendering to federal authorities in Maryland.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Timothy Sullivan explained the charges to Bolton and asked if he understood them and the potential penalties of up to ten years per count and a maximum fine of $250,000 per count. 

‘I do your honor,’ Bolton said during his arraignment at the federal courthouse in Greenbelt, Md. 

He was indicted on eight counts of transmission of national defense information and ten counts of retention of national defense information.

‘From on or about April 9, 2018, through at least on or about August 22, 2025, BOLTON abused his position as National Security Advisor by sharing more than a thousand pages of information about his day-to-day activities as the National Security Advisor — including information relating to the national defense which was classified up to the TOP SECRET/SCI level — with two unauthorized individuals, namely Individuals 1 and 2,’ the indictment reads. ‘BOLTON also unlawfully retained documents, writings, and notes relating to the national defense, including information classified up to the TOP SECRET/SCI level, in his home in Montgomery County, Maryland.’

The documents Bolton allegedly transmitted were sent to two individuals unauthorized to view classified documents, the indictment said.

Those documents, according to the indictment, revealed intelligence about future attacks by an adversarial group in another country, a liaison partner sharing sensitive information with the U.S. intelligence community, intelligence that a foreign adversary was planning a missile launch in the future and a covert action in a foreign country that was related to sensitive intergovernmental actions, among other information.

‘The FBI’s investigation revealed that John Bolton allegedly transmitted top secret information using personal online accounts and retained said documents in his house in direct violation of federal law,’ said FBI Director Kash Patel. ‘The case was based on meticulous work from dedicated career professionals at the FBI who followed the facts without fear or favor. Weaponization of justice will not be tolerated, and this FBI will stop at nothing to bring to justice anyone who threatens our national security.’

Photographers snapped images of Bolton leaving his home in Bethesda, Md., earlier Friday. He was later captured on news cameras walking into the federal courthouse. 

When asked by Fox News at the scene if he had a comment, Bolton just walked into the building.

Bolton’s Maryland home had been raided by FBI agents in August. That search was focused on classified documents that investigators believed Bolton possessed. 

‘Now, I have become the latest target in weaponizing the Justice Department to charge those he deems to be his enemies with charges that were declined before or distort the facts,’ Bolton said in a statement Friday to The Associated Press, referencing President Donald Trump.

Bolton’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, added in a statement to the AP that the ‘underlying facts in this case were investigated and resolved years ago.’

‘Bolton kept diaries — that is not a crime,’ he said, noting that Bolton ‘did not unlawfully share or store any information.’

Lowell told the AP that the charges Bolton faces are linked to portions of Bolton’s personal diaries and included unclassified information that was shared with only immediate family members. Lowell also said this was known to the FBI dating back to at least 2021.

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

Trump-appointed lawyers leading key federal court districts in blue states have become wrapped up in legal disputes that are testing their authority and threatening to undermine criminal cases they are overseeing.

U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, who brought a high-profile indictment against former FBI Director James Comey in Virginia, is in the hot seat, as are President Donald Trump’s appointees in New Jersey, California and Nevada.

In a sign of his growing frustration over the matter, Trump wrote in a pair of statements Thursday night that he had ‘eight GREAT Republican U.S. Attorney Candidates’ who did not have a path to Senate confirmation in blue states, blaming the upper chamber’s ‘blue slip’ tradition. He called the precedent, which requires home-state senators to approve of U.S. attorney nominees, ‘stupid and outdated.’

Vulnerability in Virginia 

Trump nominated Erik Siebert to be U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia, but he ousted Siebert in September and blamed it on Siebert securing blue slips from the state’s two Democratic senators. In reality, Siebert opposed bringing criminal charges against two of Trump’s top political nemeses, Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

At Trump’s direction, Halligan, a former insurance lawyer with no prosecutorial experience, entered the scene within days.

Halligan brought indictments against both Comey and James, which could now come back to haunt the Department of Justice.

Josh Blackman, professor at South Texas College of Law, noted that when she charged Comey, Halligan was the lone prosecutor to sign his indictment alleging he made a false statement to Congress. Comey has since told the court that he plans to contest Halligan’s authority because of the unconventional way Trump installed her to lead the U.S. attorney’s office.

‘The Halligan issue is central to the James Comey prosecution, and if, for whatever reason, it’s found that she was not properly appointed — she was the only person who signed the Comey indictment — that indictment’s thrown out, so the stakes are actually pretty high,’ Blackman told Fox News Digital.

The judge could also toss out Comey’s case on other grounds before addressing Halligan’s appointment, which could allow the court to avoid addressing the matter.

Halligan was also the lone prosecutor to sign James’ bank fraud indictment. By contrast, several prosecutors appeared in court on Thursday for former National Security Adviser John Bolton’s indictment in Maryland and signed onto the 26-page charging document.

‘Utterly implausible’ that president can’t choose his appointees

Halligan is not the only temporary U.S. attorney facing scrutiny. Another Trump ally, Alina Habba, has seen her authority called into question in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in New Jersey, where Democratic Sens. Cory Booker and Andy Kim refuse to support her, creating at least one insurmountable obstacle to her permanent confirmation.

When Habba’s interim term expired, Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi used a series of loopholes in federal vacancy laws to bypass the Senate, fire Habba’s court-appointed successor and re-install Habba as ‘acting’ U.S. attorney, which carries a 210-day term.

Judge Matthew Brann found Habba’s appointment was unlawful, and now the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit will hear arguments over Habba’s appointment on Monday in a case that could be headed for the Supreme Court.

In court papers, the DOJ argued federal vacancy laws established by Congress and the Constitution favored the president.

‘It is utterly implausible that Congress intended the default to be that the President must rely on career officials who may disagree with his policies to serve as acting political officers during the critical period at the start of an administration,’ DOJ lawyers wrote.

But the trend of challenging Trump’s workarounds did not stop with Habba.

More blue state blues

A federal judge disqualified Sigal Chattah from serving as the temporary U.S. attorney in Nevada, while Acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli is facing a court challenge after Trump and Bondi extended his tenure in the Central District of California, where pivotal immigration-related cases are playing out.

Three sets of defendants facing charges in California are seeking to have their cases tossed on the grounds that Essayli is an invalid appointee. They alleged in court filings that using loopholes to skip over Essayli’s Senate confirmation is following ‘a handbook for circumventing the protections that the Constitution and Congress built against the limitless, unaccountable handpicking of temporary officials.’

Carl Tobias, professor at University of Richmond law school, told Fox News Digital in August that Trump’s maneuvers to keep his most loyal prosecutors in positions of power defy the spirit of the Constitution.

‘It’s good to have that scrutiny from the Judiciary Committee and then on the [Senate] floor, and so hopefully they could return to something like that, but I’m not sure that’s going to happen, and so I think it is troubling,’ Tobias said.

Although the contentious fight for presidents to push their nominees through the Senate is not new, Blackman said Trump’s escalation of the disputes is uncharted territory and that the issue is ‘two-fold.’

‘The first problem is the senators are perhaps not giving deference to Trump’s picks if they don’t have to,’ Blackman said. ‘The second issue is, does the law actually permit these sort of workarounds? And I think Trump is sort of pushing novel grounds. This hasn’t really been tested before like this.’