Author

admin

Browsing

Novo Nordisk on Wednesday reported first-quarter earnings that beat expectations, driven by continued demand for its blockbuster obesity drug Wegovy, even as surging competition from US drug compounders prompted the Danish pharmaceutical giant to cut its full-year sales outlook.

The maker of Wegovy and diabetes drug Ozempic said net sales in the first quarter rose 18% to 78.09 billion Danish kroner ($11.15 billion), slightly below analysts’ estimates.

Sales of Wegovy jumped 83% from a year earlier to 17.36 billion kroner. However, the figure fell short of the 18.51 billion kroner forecast in a FactSet poll.

The company lowered its full-year sales growth forecast to between 13% and 21% at constant exchange rates, down from a previous range of 16% to 24%.

Operating profit growth is now projected at 16% to 24%, versus the prior 19% to 27%.

Novo’s CEO, Lars Fruergaard Jørgensen, blamed the downgrade on the rapid rise of compounded alternatives in the United States.

“Compounders took a part of our business away,” Jørgensen said in an interview with CNBC, referring to US-based pharmacies that mix and sell their own versions of semaglutide, the active ingredient in Wegovy and Ozempic.

“We now expect that compounding will be knocked off, so to say, and we get that business growth going forward.”

Shares of the company were up nearly 6% in London on Wednesday morning following the earnings announcement and optimistic commentary from management.

Invezz takes a look at how a shortage of obesity drugs created a multi-billion dollar industry of its compounded copycats.

Source: Bloomberg

Compounders take a bite out of brand-name sales

For over two years, Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly have been grappling with a surge in compounding, an old pharmaceutical practice that became a multibillion-dollar industry after the FDA declared shortages of GLP-1 drugs like Wegovy and Zepbound in 2022.

That ruling allowed pharmacies to produce semaglutide-based treatments independently, often at a fraction of the price.

Some patients reportedly paid under $200 per month for compounded versions.

Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk now typically charge around $500 per month for their brand-name weight-loss drugs to patients paying out of pocket instead of using insurance, but until recently, patients had to pay as much as $1,300 a month.

Compounded medications do not undergo clinical trials or FDA approval and are considered to carry a higher risk, though some providers insist they meet safety and quality standards.

Novo and Lilly have been under pressure as telemedicine platforms and medical spas capitalized on the demand, with companies like Hims & Hers reporting over $225 million in revenue tied to weight-loss offerings, primarily from compounded drugs.

Last month, Eli Lilly sued four compounding pharmacies, alleging they sold unauthorised products containing tirzepatide, the active ingredient in its blockbuster diabetes and weight-loss drug Mounjaro.

Booming market, murky oversight

The rise of Ozempic marked a turning point for compounding pharmacies, drawing in more patients, revenue, and attention than ever before.

This booming business took off in 2022 after the FDA declared a shortage of drugs from Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly.

Under federal law, compounding is permitted during such shortages or when a patient’s needs cannot be met by commercially available medications.

In many cases, even those with diabetes turned to compounders due to the lack of availability of the branded options.

Compounded drugs are typically made by mixing active pharmaceutical ingredients, usually imported in powder form from China, with additives like sterile water and stabilizers.

These drugs bypass the rigorous FDA approval process and clinical trials, which have raised safety concerns.

While the FDA does regulate compounding, oversight is limited.

The agency’s compounding division is small and has long lacked the resources to keep pace with the explosion in demand, leading to what critics call insufficient enforcement.

Despite this, compounders insist their products are safe.

A trade group representing large compounding pharmacies estimates millions of Americans are currently receiving weight-loss treatments through compounding, potentially rivalling the market share of brand-name drugs.

Will FDA’s crackdown really end compounding?

In February, the FDA declared the drug shortages over and set deadlines for compounders to cease production.

Small pharmacies had until April 22 to stop offering compounded Wegovy; larger compounders have until May 22.

“Following the US FDA removal of semaglutide injectables from the FDA drug shortage list, the sales outlook assumes a reduction in patients on compounded GLP-1 treatment during the second half of 2025,” Novo said.

The company has also reiterated its intention to pursue legal action against compounders that continue to distribute copycat versions of its products unlawfully.

While the FDA’s move is expected to reduce compounded drug sales significantly, experts say enforcement challenges remain.

“We’re about to see just how creative the compounding industry can get,” said Lindsay Allen, a health economist at Northwestern University, in a New York Times report, noting that some compounders are already exploring ways to tweak formulations to evade crackdowns.

While Novo Nordisk remains confident that branded sales will recover as regulatory pressure mounts on compounders, industry watchers caution that the market for unapproved versions of weight-loss drugs may not vanish entirely.

Some compounders are already altering doses or adding vitamins in a bid to exploit legal gray areas, raising questions about how effective the FDA can be in curbing the practice.

The post How copycats of Wegovy, Zepbound created a billion-dollar market appeared first on Invezz

Orsted announced on Wednesday that it will no longer proceed with the construction of a significant offshore wind farm in Britain. 

The company attributed this decision to a worsening global business climate for renewable energy projects, according to a Reuters report

This move represents a setback for the UK’s goals to reduce carbon emissions from its energy sources.

The Denmark-based company has experienced an approximately 80% decline in its market value since its 2021 high. 

This decrease can be attributed to increasing costs, supply chain disruptions, and diminished investor confidence stemming from opposition to offshore wind by US President Donald Trump.

Hornsea 4 project cancelled

Cancelling the Hornsea 4 offshore wind farm, a major global project, could cost Orsted up to 5.5 billion Danish crowns ($837.85 million) in break fees and write-downs, according to the report. 

The company stated that the anticipated value of the project has decreased.

Orsted CEO Rasmus Errboe said in a statement:

The combination of increased supply chain costs, higher interest rates, and increased execution risk has deteriorated the expected value creation of the project.

Appointed CEO in January, Errboe is tasked with restoring investor confidence and restructuring the company to align with the evolving offshore wind sector.

“We believe the decision was needed to ensure we only bring forward assets which we are confident will deliver the value that we would like to see,” Errboe was quoted in the report.

The Hornsea 4 project had not yet reached a final investment decision. 

However, Britain’s Department for Energy Security and Net Zero expressed hope for a potential revival of the project plans.

“We recognise the effect that globally high inflation and supply chain constraints are having on industry across Europe, and we will work with Orsted to get Hornsea 4 back on track,” a spokesperson was quoted by Reuters in the report.

Trump proves negative for shares

Orsted shares fell by more than 2% on Wednesday. However, their value has decreased by approximately one-third since Trump’s re-election in November of the previous year.

“The cancellation of Hornsea 4 comes as a surprise but highlights stronger discipline under the new CEO,” Bernstein said in a research note.

Despite Trump’s support for fossil fuels, Britain, Orsted’s typically stable growth region and the largest offshore wind market outside China, is focused on decarbonising its electricity sector to combat global warming.

In September of the previous year, Orsted was awarded a 2.4 gigawatt contract for its Hornsea 4 project. 

This offshore wind farm is situated off the coast of Yorkshire in northern England. 

The contract was secured through a British renewables power auction, the purpose of which was to bolster the project’s viability.

Errboe said:

We believe that the UK government is doing everything right in terms of the framework.

Operational headwinds and financial performance

The industry has faced headwinds recently due to increasing costs, supply chain disruptions, elevated interest rates, and the more recent emergence of trade tensions.

Orsted announced on Wednesday that US tariffs on steel, aluminum, and related items have inflated the costs of its two US offshore wind projects. 

This has led to a 1.2 billion crown impairment. However, the company affirmed that construction will proceed as planned.

For the first quarter of the year (January to March), the company reported a profit of 8.6 billion Danish crowns before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortisation, excluding new partnerships and cancellation fees.

Analysts had generally anticipated an EBITDA of 7.88 billion crowns, according to a company poll.

Orsted maintained its 2025 forecast, which excludes new partnerships and cancellation fees. However, this outlook did not factor in the expenses associated with the Hornsea 4 cancellation.

The post Orsted cancels major UK offshore wind project amid rising costs appeared first on Invezz

Shares of Walt Disney Co. surged early Wednesday after the entertainment giant delivered stronger-than-expected earnings and unveiled plans to build a new theme park in Abu Dhabi—marking its first major expansion into the Middle East.

The stock jumped 10% to $101.43 in early trading, a notable rebound for a company whose shares had declined more than 17% so far this year while rivals Netflix and Comcast are up 28% and down 8.1%, respectively.

For the quarter ended March 31, Disney reported adjusted earnings of $1.45 per share, exceeding Wall Street’s expectations of $1.19, according to data from FactSet.

Revenue rose 7% year-on-year to $23.6 billion, also ahead of the consensus estimate of $23.1 billion.

Disney’s earnings were bolstered by solid results across its key business units, particularly its experiences segment, which includes theme parks, cruises, and resorts, and its streaming platforms.

“Our outstanding performance this quarter-with adjusted EPS up 20% from the prior year, driven by our entertainment and experiences businesses-underscores our continued success building for growth and executing across our strategic priorities,” said Disney Chief Executive Robert Iger.

“Overall, we remain optimistic about the direction of the company and our outlook for the remainder of the fiscal year.”

This offered reassurance to investors who had grown concerned about the potential impact of President Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs on consumer sentiment and discretionary spending.

Experiences and streaming drive growth

Revenue from Disney’s experiences segment rose 6% to $8.9 billion, beating analyst expectations of $8.7 billion.

The company reported increased attendance and higher spending at its US parks, though international operations saw a dip in operating income.

The expansion into Abu Dhabi is part of a broader strategy to invest approximately $60 billion over the next decade into the experiences segment, which now accounts for the majority of Disney’s operating income.

In addition to new parks, the company is also ramping up investments in cruise lines and ride development at its existing locations.

Streaming, another pillar of Disney’s business, also posted a strong performance.

Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ together added 2.5 million subscribers during the quarter.

Operating profit for the streaming division rose to $336 million, a significant jump from $47 million a year ago.

The improved profitability comes after years of heavy investment in content and technology to build out the platforms.

Disney theme park in Abu Dhabi: a “capital light” way to enter the market

Shortly after posting results, Disney revealed plans to build a new theme park in Abu Dhabi, a move that expands its global footprint to a seventh location.

The park will be located on Yas Island, already home to attractions like Ferrari World and Warner Bros. World, and will be developed in partnership with Miral, a state-backed company known for its work on large-scale entertainment projects in the region.

The company did not disclose a launch date or the scope of the park, but called the venture its most advanced and interactive yet.

The resort will be designed by Disney Imagineers and operated under Disney’s supervision, while Miral will handle financing and construction.

In return, Disney will receive a share of the park’s revenue, though specific financial terms were not made public.

“This groundbreaking resort destination represents a new frontier in theme park development,” said Josh D’Amaro, chairman of Disney’s experiences division.

“It is a testament to the strength of our brand and our confidence in the long-term demand for immersive entertainment.”

CEO Bob Iger described the Abu Dhabi project as a capital-light way to enter a new market, which allows Disney to preserve resources for other investments.

He noted that the Middle East has long shown a strong affinity for Disney’s characters and content, but that the company had so far “just scratched the surface” in the region.

Cautious optimism despite upbeat forecast

Despite the earnings beat, Disney maintained a cautious tone about the rest of the fiscal year.

It raised its full-year earnings guidance to $5.75 per share, above the analyst forecast of $5.43.

However, the company warned that it continues to monitor “macroeconomic developments for potential impacts to our businesses,” citing ongoing uncertainty about the broader operating environment.

The stock’s rise on Wednesday was a welcome sign for shareholders, many of whom have been frustrated with the company’s underperformance.

While Netflix has rallied 28% this year, Disney has struggled amid concerns over consumer spending, international park recovery, and the high costs associated with its streaming operations.

Still, the latest results and the announcement of a new park suggest that Disney is positioning itself for long-term growth.

The company’s ability to leverage its intellectual property across platforms—from theme parks to streaming to merchandise—remains a competitive advantage as it navigates an uncertain economic climate.

The post Disney (DIS) stock soars as its theme parks, streaming divisions boost earnings appeared first on Invezz

US stocks moved higher on Wednesday as investors tracked developments in trade negotiations and awaited the Federal Reserve’s interest rate decision later in the day.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 225 points, or 0.5%, while the S&P 500 added 0.4% and the Nasdaq Composite gained 0.3%.

Disney shares jumped over 10% following a stronger-than-expected earnings report and a surprise increase in streaming subscribers. In contrast, Uber shares fell roughly 6% after the company missed revenue expectations.

Markets were buoyed by news that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will meet with Chinese officials in Switzerland this week, which was seen as a positive step following recent trade tensions triggered by President Trump’s tariff hikes.

Attention now turns to Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s post-meeting press conference, with investors looking for guidance on the path of interest rates.

US-China trade negotiations

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will meet with Chinese officials in Switzerland this weekend to discuss trade and economic issues, their offices confirmed Tuesday evening.

Bessent told Fox News the focus would be on easing tensions rather than negotiating a comprehensive trade deal, stating, “My sense is that this will be about de-escalation, not about the big trade deal… But we’ve got to de-escalate, before we can move forward.”

Current US tariffs on Chinese imports stand at 145%, following Trump’s recent hike in response to retaliatory measures from Beijing.

The development followed President Trump’s comments during a meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, where he said, “we don’t have to sign deals” with other countries, “they have to sign deals with us.”

Eyes on the Fed meeting

The Federal Reserve is set to announce its interest rate decision on Wednesday afternoon.

The CME FedWatch Tool shows a 96.8% probability that rates will be held steady.

The meeting follows recent criticism of Powell from President Trump, who previously suggested his removal, though later clarified he had no intention of firing the Fed chief.

With no updates scheduled for the Fed’s economic projections or its dot plot at this meeting, investors will focus on the post-meeting statement and Chair Jerome Powell’s press conference for insight into the central bank’s policy outlook.

“The market is still pricing in more than three rate cuts this year, likely beginning in July,” said BofA economist Claudio Irigoyen.

However, he noted that given the Fed’s dual mandate, delaying cuts to focus on inflation control and maintaining policy credibility would be preferable—unless economic activity deteriorates significantly.

Concerns about inflation are intensifying as the US pursues more protectionist trade measures, including a 145% tariff on Chinese imports.

Stocks initially fell after President Trump’s April 2 tariff announcement but have since rebounded, helped by a 90-day pause on some of the higher duties.

“Stagflation seems to be the hardest word … But everything keeps pointing in that direction,” Irigoyen wrote, adding that elevated inflation combined with weakening growth could push the economy into a stagflationary phase.

That would further complicate the Fed’s policy decisions, making its approach increasingly dependent on how the data evolves.

The post US stocks in green ahead of Fed meet: Dow up 225 points, Nasdaq gains 0.3% appeared first on Invezz

The $TRUMP token has seen a sharp reversal in fortune.

Once surging on the back of a high-profile dinner invitation from President Trump himself, the meme coin is now under intense scrutiny from regulators as losses mount for the majority of holders.

Chainalysis data shared with CNBC confirms that while the top 58 wallets made a combined $1.1 billion in profit, over 764,000 wallets that bought into the hype are now in the red.

The surge in interest, fuelled by promises of exclusive access and political proximity, has raised deeper concerns about financial transparency, insider gains, and foreign influence within the crypto fundraising ecosystem.

$TRUMP token hype driven by Trump-backed dinner promise

Interest in the TRUMP token intensified when Donald Trump teased an exclusive gala dinner for the top 220 token holders.

The $TRUMP token has experienced extreme volatility in recent weeks, driven largely by political association and an exclusive promotional campaign.

Initially tied to the prospect of Donald Trump’s second presidential term, the token gained renewed momentum after a May 22 event was announced, offering top holders access to a black-tie-optional dinner with the president at his Trump National Golf Club in Washington, D.C.

Fight Fight Fight LLC. and CIC Digital LLC., the entities controlling most of the token’s supply, have remained largely opaque, though their influence over price movements is evident.

The dinner promotion triggered a sharp spike in demand, particularly among speculative traders, pushing the token’s market cap to $2.7 billion before falling back to roughly $2.17 billion.

Despite this inflow, returns have been highly uneven, with price swings amplified by broader market instability and the token’s limited liquidity distribution.

The event, pitched as an elite gathering tied to Trump’s crypto and AI ambitions, triggered a 50% surge in interest.

Chainalysis data shows over 100,000 new wallets have entered the market since April 15, with more than half—54,000—buying in after the event announcement.

$900,000 in trading fees sparks ethics probe

The token’s popularity—and its sharp concentration of profit—has drawn political and regulatory attention.

According to a CNBC report, Trump and close associates generated nearly $900,000 in trading fees over a 48-hour period following the announcement of the dinner.

The Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations has since opened an inquiry into potential conflicts of interest.

At the heart of the probe are concerns about token ownership, financial disclosures, and ties to foreign entities.

Investigators are focusing on whether promotional activity linked to the dinner, combined with anonymous crypto flows, may have enabled undisclosed contributions to Trump-affiliated fundraising entities.

The probe is also looking into World Liberty Financial, another Trump-linked crypto venture.

Its connections to overseas backers, including a state-affiliated Emirati fund and controversial crypto figure Justin Sun, are under particular scrutiny.

Crypto and AI fundraiser raises transparency concerns

Separate from the $TRUMP token dinner, Trump’s super PAC is reportedly offering another high-priced event—this time called the “Crypto & AI Innovators” dinner.

Entry costs $1.5 million per person. However, there is no public requirement to disclose the identities of attendees.

While political donations in fiat currency are subject to disclosure rules, payments made in crypto are not.

This gap is raising fresh concerns about hidden influence and a lack of transparency.

Given the current scrutiny of the $TRUMP token and World Liberty Financial, watchdog groups have flagged the risk of foreign or anonymous interests gaining outsized access to political decision-makers through crypto-focused events.

The post Data reveals $TRUMP meme coin profited a few, while 764K have lost money appeared first on Invezz

Secretary of State Marco Rubio is planning to merge the responsibilities of the Palestinian Affairs Office into the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem in an effort to continue a diplomatic mission in Israel’s capital that was put in place by President Donald Trump during his first term in office.

State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce announced Rubio’s decision during a press briefing Tuesday.

‘Secretary Rubio has decided to merge the responsibilities of the office of the Palestinian Affairs Office fully into other sections of the United States Embassy in Jerusalem,’ Bruce said. ‘This decision will restore the first Trump-term framework of a unified U.S. diplomatic mission in Israel’s capital that reports to the U.S. ambassador to Israel.’

She added that U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee will begin to make the necessary changes to implement the merger over the coming weeks.

‘The United States remains committed to its historic relationship with Israel, bolstering Israel’s security and securing peace to create a better life for the entire region,’ Bruce said.

The Biden administration established the U.S. Office of Palestinian Affairs in 2022 after reversing Trump’s closure of the consulate to the Palestinians in Jerusalem during his first administration.

Biden’s move was viewed by some as rewarding the Palestinian leadership after a wave of terrorism during which two Palestinians wielding an ax and knife murdered three Israelis in the town of Elad in May 2022.

The first Trump administration helped to negotiate groundbreaking agreements, called the Abraham Accords, in 2020 to normalize diplomatic relations between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco.

The Israeli government vehemently opposed a reopening of the Palestinian consulate in Jerusalem because it would undercut the holy city as the undivided capital of Israel.

The U.S. Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and calls for it to remain an undivided city. 

Trump, in 2017, recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital in 2017 and moved the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem the following year.

Fox News’ Benjamin Weinthal contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Donald Trump’s new special envoy to the Middle East was sworn in by Secretary of State Marco Rubio Tuesday in an Oval Office ceremony.

Speaking before the swearing-in, Trump praised Witkoff, who was instrumental in securing an extended ceasefire between Israel and Hamas and the return of 33 hostages, including two Americans, who were being held by Hamas. 

Trump said Witkoff has ‘been with me, more or less, one way or the other, every step of the way,’ adding that he has ‘absolute confidence and support and trust’ in his Middle East envoy’s ability to secure key deals in the realm of foreign diplomacy, such as ceasefire agreements between Israel and Hamas and between Ukraine and Russia. 

Though Witkoff is a real estate businessman by trade, Trump said he ‘quickly established himself as one of the toughest, smartest and best negotiators in the business,’ which is why he chose him for the important role of special envoy to the Middle East.

‘As a businessman, he’s admired and respected by all, and now Steve is putting his talents to work for America’s special envoy to the United States and making a lot of progress. Our country is blessed to have a negotiator of such skill and experience who really selflessly steps up to the plate, puts himself forward all the time,’ the president said.

Trump did note there was somewhat of a learning curve for Witkoff when it came to foreign government relations but said he has been ‘figuring it out’ at a lightning pace. 

‘It takes him about an hour to figure it out,’ Trump said. ‘After that, he’s brutal. He does a great job.’ 

Trump noted Witkoff has already been active over the last several months, meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and leaders from Iran. 

‘He’s working tirelessly to end the bloody and destructive conflicts,’ said Trump, touting Witkoff’s success so far in negotiations with various world leaders.

After the ceremony, Trump took questions from reporters, addressing a range of topics, including the just-announced ceasefire between the U.S. and the Houthis. When asked about conflicting reports indicating the Houthis do not plan to stop attacking Israel, Trump said that the terror group’s surrogates have indicated ‘very strongly’ that ‘they want nothing to do with [the United States].’  

Trump was also asked questions about the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, and, in particular, about the release of the remaining 21 living hostages. 

‘This is a terrible situation. We’re trying to get the hostages out. We’ve gotten a lot of them out,’ Trump told reporters, noting it is also just important to find and return the bodies of those already killed by Hamas. 

He shared that two weeks ago a couple whose son died as a hostage came to him and said, ‘Please, sir, my son is dead. Please get us back his body.’ 

‘They wanted his body. He’s dead,’ Trump said from the Oval Office after Witkoff’s confirmation. ‘They know. He said they wanted his body as much as you would want the boy if he was alive. It’s a very sad thing.’

Trump also commented on Iran and its potential development of nuclear weaponry. The president said definitively that ‘they’re not going to have a nuclear weapon.’

‘This is really crunch time. I would tell you, for Iran and for their country, this is a very important time for Iran. This is the most important time in the history of Iran, for Iran, and I hope they do what’s right,’ Trump told reporters. 

‘I’d love to see a peace deal, a strong peace deal. … We want it to be a successful country,’ he added. ‘We don’t want to do anything that’s going to get in the way of that. But they can’t have a nuclear weapon. And if they choose to go a different route, it’s going to be a very sad thing. And it’s something we don’t want to have to do, but we have no choice.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Israeli and Turkish warplanes skirmished over Syria this past weekend. 

Israel, in northern Syria, has been bombing militias affiliated with the government of Turkey. According to Turkish media sources, Ankara’s F-16s sent ‘warning messages’ to the Israeli planes. 

Israel denied the reports of the aerial confrontation.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey’s president, said that the ‘Israeli attacks compromise the balance in the region since the fall of the Syrian regime.’ Bashar al-Assad fled Syria to Russia as his totalitarian government fell in early December. He has since been granted asylum there.   

The recent aerial confrontation could spark a wider war and put an end to attempts by the former militant and Syria’s current president, Ahmed al-Sharaa, to reestablish stability and move his country closer to the United States. 

Disruptive actors want to take over Damascus. Erdogan, for instance, helped bring down Assad and now hopes to pull Syria into his orbit. China, which supported the horrific Assad regime until the end, is now trying to influence the new government in Damascus so it can eventually dominate that country.

Sharaa is resisting Beijing’s attempts. ‘Syria is now led by a true reformer,’ Jonathan Bass, who had extensive discussions with Sharaa in Damascus last week about religious freedom and other topics, told me. 

‘This is a critical moment in Syria’s transition,’ Dr. Sharvan Ibesh of the Bahar Organization, a humanitarian NGO active in Syria, told me last week.

Ibesh’s assessment is certainly correct. Before Sharaa can achieve anything, he will need to end the conflict in his skies. There is only one person who can separate Israel, America’s long-term partner in the region, and Turkey, an increasingly troublesome NATO ally. That person, of course, is President Donald Trump.

Why would Trump get involved? 

There are two principal reasons. First, Sharaa wants trade and investment. This is an historic opportunity for American business, which has been shut out of that portion of the region. Syria is devastated after decades of misrule and war, and Americans can build, sell, and provide just about everything.

The second reason involves China. ‘Syria is up for grabs,’ Mouaz Moustafa of the Syrian Emergency Task Force, a humanitarian group active in that country, said to me. ‘The Chinese continue to push hard to fill a vacuum, knowing that the longer the U.S. takes to come along the higher the chances are that China will economically occupy Syria.’

‘We do not want to be stuck with China being the only choice for Syria when it comes to rebuilding our liberated country,’ says the Bahar Organization’s Ibesh.

Dr. Haytham Albizem of Global Justice, a U.S.-based NGO, told me that President Sharaa has not accepted Beijing’s persistent offers but ‘eventually he will shake the hand that wants to help him rebuild the country he leads if he does not have any alternative.’

Bass, CEO of Argent LNG, confirms that Beijing has pressured Syrian officials to take its money but the Syrians have held out because of concerns about the long-term effects of Chinese presence. Sharaa in fact told Bass he wants to build a ‘pluralistic society,’ in other words, a nation not like China but like America.

Washington’s sanctions, put in place during the Assad years, prevent American involvement. Trump can lift them.

Trump will be in Saudi Arabia next week. He will visit Riyadh on May 13. Syrian officials are trying to schedule a meeting between the American president and Sharaa in the Saudi capital to discuss U.S. companies entering Syria. 

‘I want to make a deal with Donald Trump,’ Sharaa told Bass. ‘He’s the only man I trust.’ 

‘He is the only man capable of fixing this region, bringing us together, one brick at a time,’ Sharaa added.

‘This is a moment when the United States can, for the first time in decades, establish vibrant commercial and investment ties with Syria and thereby bring peace to the Middle East as a whole,’ Bass says.

If, however, China takes over Syria, which borders Israel in the Golan Heights, there will be no peace. Beijing fully backed Iran’s October 7 assault on the Jewish state with economic, diplomatic, propaganda, and weapons support. China will similarly disrupt the region from Syria if it gains control of Damascus.

‘If China is entrenched in Syria, it means Iran will be entrenched there too,’ Bass says. ‘The stakes are high for America because Israel would be pressured by a China-Iran proxy directly on one of its borders.’ 

That’s true, but America’s continued role in the region raises a broader issue. ‘Does the USA want to be the Policeman of the Middle East, getting NOTHING but spending precious lives and trillions of dollars protecting others who, in almost all cases, do not appreciate what we are doing?’ Trump tweeted in December 2018. 

Obviously not. But Sharaa, as he told Bass, wants to make Syria like America, not with the American military but with American goods, investment, and services. 

The opportunity for the U.S. is historic.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

In the world of President Donald Trump, the constant refrain that he ‘needs to do this’ or ‘must pass that’ in the next 200 days misses the point entirely. Trump doesn’t operate within the usual political playbook, and trying to fit him into conventional expectations is a mistake. Advisers often treat him like a typical politician: pass policies, build alliances, show a unified front. Tone it down.  Stop being so…. Well, Trumpian.  But that’s not who he is. And it certainly isn’t what he should do.

Trump’s power lies in owning the story, controlling the narrative’s chaos, and shaking things up in ways no one else can—or would dare to. 

His actions may seem reckless or absurd to some, but they’re often strategic—designed to grab attention, set the agenda, and keep everyone reacting to him. 

Let’s think about the events over just the last several days. Trump once again seized the digital spotlight, posting AI-generated images of himself as the pope and a ‘Star Wars’ character, musing about reopening Alcatraz, vacillating on tariffs, and even questioning his adherence to the Constitution. 

As expected, the world reacted: some with admiration, others with indignation. His supporters lauded him as a bold disruptor of the status quo, while critics labeled him dangerous, blasphemous, even absurd.

If you take every Donald Trump moment at face value, you’re missing the point.

But here’s the crux: if you take every Trump moment at face value, you’re missing the point.

To truly grasp Donald Trump, you need to step back—not just from the headlines, but from the impulse to interpret every word, post, or proposal literally. 

His approach isn’t straightforward. It’s theatrical, rhetorical, and deeply strategic. Parsing his statements is akin to interpreting religious texts. Some see every word as gospel truth. Others find symbolism, guidance, or metaphor. The same spectrum of interpretation applies to Trump.

If you treat Trump’s words as fixed policy declarations, you’ll find yourself in chaos. But if you view them as part of a broader strategy—to capture attention, steer the conversation, and frame negotiations—you begin to discern the method in the madness.

Consider tariffs. Are they economic policy? Or a pressure tactic? I’d argue they’re the latter—a means to move markets, project toughness, and reset expectations. Or take his musings about running in 2028. Is that a literal campaign launch? Or is he shaping the narrative around leadership, succession, and legacy?

This is Trump’s true power: not in the precision of his plans, but in his ability to control the agenda. He creates noise not to distract, but to dominate. He doesn’t wait to join the conversation—he is the conversation. And in doing so, he forces everyone else to react on his terms.

So, what should Trump do in the next 200 days? The answer is simple: keep doing what he’s doing. The more he challenges conventions, the more he reaffirms his brand as the disruptor who fights for ‘the everyman.’ Policy details don’t necessarily matter as much as the message that he is shaking up the establishment and battling an unfair system. 

Success for him isn’t about passing specific bills; it’s about owning the conversation and proving he’s the only one willing to blow things up to get results.

If Trump can continue this strategy—owning the narrative, showing he’s fighting for the ‘little guy,’ and not over-complicating it—he remains relevant. 

The reality? His core support won’t shift because of policy; it’ll shift if he stops being Trump. So, the next 200 days should be about staying true to his persona, deciding what noise to generate, and letting others scramble to chase his lead.

Ultimately, how you interpret Trump’s actions reveals more about you than about him. If you see him as a menace, every statement becomes a threat. If you see him as a visionary, every statement signals bold change. If you see him as a negotiator, the unpredictability makes perfect sense.

You don’t have to like Trump to understand him. But ignoring the mechanics of how he shapes public discourse is missing the most crucial part of the story.

He’s not just running for office. He’s running the conversation. And in essence, Trump needs to keep doing what he does best—disrupt, distract, and dominate. The rest is just noise.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee has called on the Department of Justice and the FBI to ‘immediately investigate’ a string of anonymous pizza deliveries sent to judges’ homes.

In the event that the DOJ and the FBI have already initiated investigations, Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Dick Durbin, D-Ill., also asked Attorney General Pam Bondi and Kash Patel for an update on those efforts. 

‘In recent months, federal judges and their relatives have received anonymous deliveries to their homes,’ Durbin wrote in a letter to Bondi and Patel on Tuesday. ‘These deliveries are threats intended to show that those seeking to intimidate the targeted judge know the judge’s address or their family members’ addresses. The targeted individuals reportedly include Supreme Court justices, judges handling legal cases involving the Administration, and the children of judges. Some of these deliveries were made using the name of Judge Esther Salas’s son, Daniel Anderl, who was murdered at the family’s home by a former litigant who posed as a deliveryman.’

‘These incidents threaten not only judges and their families, but also judicial independence and the rule of law,’ Durbin wrote. ‘It is imperative that the Justice Department (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) investigate these anonymous or pseudonymous deliveries and that those responsible be held accountable to the full extent of the law.’

Durbin asked that Bondi and Patel provide ‘information on any steps that DOJ or the FBI have taken to protect the judges and their families who have received anonymous or pseudonymous deliveries and to prevent further anonymous or pseudonymous deliveries and other threats.’ His letter also highlighted ‘the essential role that the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) plays in protecting the federal judiciary and urge you to ensure that the size of the USMS workforce is not reduced.’ 

The Democrat said USMS Acting Director Mark P. Pittella reportedly sent a letter on April 15 to more than 5,000 USMS employees offering them the opportunity to resign. 

‘In the midst of increasing threats of violence against judges, it is inappropriate and unacceptable to reduce the size of the agency tasked with protecting the federal judiciary and the judicial process,’ Durbin wrote. ‘Accordingly, I ask you to commit to fully supporting USMS and to maintaining or increasing its current number of employees.’ 

The letter further asked that Bondi and Patel brief the committee and provide responses to a series of questions by May 20, including how many anonymous pizza deliveries have been sent to judges’ homes or the homes of their family members since Jan. 20 – President Donald Trump’s Inauguration Day; whether each matter prompted an investigation and if not, why; and how many suspects have been identified and if there’s any reason to suspect coordination. 

Durbin said any responses with ‘classified or law-enforcement sensitive material’ should be sent to the committee Democrats under a separate cover.

The letter only named one impacted judge – U.S. District Judge Esther Salas. 

Salas’ 20-year-old son, Daniel Anderl, was murdered on July 19, 2020, at the family’s home in North Brunswick, New Jersey. The gunman, who posed as a FedEx delivery driver, also critically wounded Salas’ husband. The suspect was identified as Roy Den Hollander, a self-proclaimed anti-feminist lawyer who previously appeared in Salas’ courtroom. Authorities said Den Hollander died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound in upstate New York days after killing Daniel. 

Before the shooting, Salas had handled high-profile cases, including those involving Jeffrey Epstein and the Real Housewives of New Jersey stars Teresa and Joe Giudice.

Last month, Salas told news outlets that she and other judges have received strange pizza deliveries at their homes, with at least 10 of them having her son’s name on the order. 

In March, Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s family members reported receiving strange pizza deliveries to separate households, Newsweek reported. Authorities said Barrett’s sister also received a bomb threat. 

J. Michelle Childs of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit also claimed in a podcast last month that a mysterious pizza delivery had arrived at her door. 

‘Federal judges are receiving anonymous deliveries as an intimidation tactic. It’s an ongoing threat… and it’s increasing,’ Durbin wrote on X. ‘Some deliveries are even using the name of a judge’s son who was murdered by a former litigant posing as a deliveryman. Attorney General Bondi and FBI Director Patel must investigate.’ 

‘Judges are facing ongoing and increasing threats… even against their families,’ Senate Judiciary Democrats said on X. ‘Pam Bondi must commit to fully supporting the Marshals Service and—at minimum—maintaining the current size of its workforce.’ 

Fox News Digital reached out to the Justice Department and the FBI for comment early Wednesday but did not immediately hear back. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS